[Blackjack] Two 4s vs Dealer's 6

[Blackjack] Two 4s vs Dealer's 6

  7:48    Japanese Nokkie

---

Blackjack Strategy 

Is the splitting beneficial to you?

In the basic strategy of Blackjack, split is recommended.

But some players choose hit, not split the pair.
I think quite a few players don't like 4's splitting.

Then why does the BS say?

I conducted a Blackjack experiment to calculate the winning percentages for both choices.

In this video, there are 20 scenes from all.
The playback time is about 15 min.

After recording the video, I collected more 80 data to get more precise results.

Results of the experiment

The following two graphs show the results based on the 100 data.

We would win at a rate of about 3/5.

Isn't it better than we expected?

The two graphs are so similar.

Then were there any differences between the two results?

The results except for a tie

 are as follows:

Winning Percentages

Split 63%    Hit 59%    

The chips fluctuation

Split +43 chips    Hit +17 chips

(Bet amount: 1 chip every time) 

To sum up, split is more preferable to win than hit.
From the result of the fluctuation, I can clearly say that it's a big chance to earn a lot.

One more graph.

The 3-unit win means, for example, one is a double down hand and the other is a normal hand.
Splitting 4s and taking a card of 5, 6, or 7, we will be able to double down.

Mentioning more about the graph above, the player succeeded in 3-unit winning 23 out of 37 times actually.
In addition, he won fourfold 5 out of 23 times.
Isn't it amazing?

I learned from this experiment that splitting 4s has a likelihood of a big winning.
I'll do it aggressively.

That's all.

Good luck for your 4's splitting.
Wish for 4-unit winning.
Bye.


Back to Main Page